A comparison of the roman empire and han dynasty

In contrast to the elegant aristocrats of feudal China, the senatorial aristocrats of the early Roman Republic were rustic and pragmatic. This thought had the effect of weakening the nobility and strengthening the emperor. Independent family forms emerged.

Women in poorer families did not have such luxury and often worked in the fields with their husbands or acted as entertainers. The city-state government had no means to prevent ambitious generals from buying off the army by looted silver and the promise of land at retirement.

Individual families used allotted plots for subsistence but did not own them; the plots were rotated among families for fairness. Periodic census divided the citizen bodies according to their wealth.

Their rulers, mostly distant relatives, still retained the title of lords and paid lip service to the now powerless king. China in the Spring and Autumn period was still in the late bronze age. Conscious of their contributions, the commons demanded a larger say in public affairs.

Each social group had well-defined roles. Roman emperors were frequently assassinated and ruled for short periods compared to the Han.

Under Trajan, the Roman Empire was estimated to have a population of about 80 million.

Comparative studies of the Roman and Han empires

Legalists also built up bureaucratic offices for efficient management and rules for secure delegation of power. He replied "Of course the pork is excellent! The basis of Roman society, as proclaimed by the laws, was the family, headed by a pater familias, who had power over his dependents.

While the Roman rulers organized a state religion [41] and the emperors took a big part in it, the Han emperors were more secular; they acknowledged the existence of the gods and took part in ceremonies, but were for the most part unconcerned with them [42].

They draw on analytical and illustrative comparisons. The precociousness of high culture relative to political and economic developments enabled bronze-age ideals to be frozen into the tenets of Confucianism and sway imperial China for more than two millennia.

Merchants were also a class, but they were subject to controls by the state and often forced to partner with the state, who also took monopolies in salt, steel and wine, further restricting merchants. Its main weapon was the chariot, which was monopolized by aristocrats.

Roman society was a relatively hierarchical society. Although a few rump states continue to exist and the Eastern empire tried several times to reconquer the west, Western Europe was securely in the hands of the barbarians.

Many Han officials were appointed based on their ability to write essays explaining Confucian thought and how it applied to the administration of the Empire.

Effective and affordable tools spread, elevating productivity. This was the lasting contribution of the Legalists, but it had to suffer bitter reactions from Confucians. Iron for the Eagles. In AD, a Chinese general overthrew the last barbarian dynasty in the north and conquered the south eight years later, reunifying China see Sui Dynasty.

The hereditary ministers owed loyalty to their lord only, not to the king. The rule of man and family values would continue to be the center of political principles. Their political power was mostly held by aristocrats, but the Roman senatorial aristocracy and the Chinese feudal aristocracy differed in characters.

For centuries, they almost annually voted for war, showing a deep militarism surpassing that of both the Greeks and the Chinese. He also noted a change in the direction of research in the s, with a refocusing on the "nature of moral, historical, and scientific thought" in Ancient Greece and China.

This deficit is only explicable with reference to academic specialization and language barriers". The Great Armies of Antiquity. The Colosseum was a state-of-the-art entertainment facility, used most infamously for gladiatorial games in which well-trained men fought, sometimes to the death, for the enjoyment of huge crowds of Roman citizens.

By embracing Confucian political ideas, the Han established a government that created a careful balance that both allowed emperors to exercise their own power and that empowered officials freedom to carry out their duties, and even to criticize government and impeach corrupt superiors.

Self-equipped military service was the foremost duty of a Roman citizen. Afterward, the Huns attacked the Romans themselves. In the wars that followed, the Han empire was divided into three contending states It was not until the 4th century that China was reunified under the Jin dynasty Chinese: For wealthy families, life was good; they displayed their wealth in lavish meals, and lived in large homes in which women lived in the inner quarters.Compare and Contrast the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty - Free download as PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read online for free.5/5(2).

The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty China: A Comparison. Introduction. The several centuries of success for Han China ( BCE – CE) and the Roman Empire (27 BCE – CE) pinpoint possibilities for comparison in the classical period.

The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were both powerful influential forces in their heyday.

[1] This research project compares the economic, social, technological and military situations of the Romans and the Hans.

The Han Dynasty (Traditional Chinese: 漢朝) emerged as a principal power in East Asia. China and Rome: a comparison of two empires. home.

Cultural comparison.

Comparison between Roman and Han Empires

Silk Road. Book. Essays. The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty of imperial China coexisted with Parthia and Kushan, spanning the mid-latitude of Eurasia and northern Africa.

Roman Empire and Han Dynasty A Short Comparison AP World History Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of.


A comparison of the roman empire and han dynasty
Rated 3/5 based on 10 review